<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Software on Joe Pantuso</title>
    <link>https://pantuso.com/tags/software/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Software on Joe Pantuso</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pantuso.com/tags/software/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Why Agile Works (And It&#39;s Not What You Think)</title>
      <link>https://pantuso.com/posts/why-agile-works/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pantuso.com/posts/why-agile-works/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The standard story about why Agile works is wrong. It goes something like: Agile is better because it&amp;rsquo;s iterative, because it surfaces requirements earlier, because it gets working software in front of users faster. All true, but none of it is the reason Agile works.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The reason Agile works is Gall&amp;rsquo;s Law.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Gall&amp;rsquo;s Law, from John Gall&amp;rsquo;s 1975 book &lt;em&gt;Systemantics&lt;/em&gt;, states: &lt;strong&gt;A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple system that worked.&lt;/strong&gt; The inverse is equally true: a complex system designed from scratch never works, and cannot be patched into something that works. You have to start over with a working simple system.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
