<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Food on Joe Pantuso</title>
    <link>https://pantuso.com/tags/food/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Food on Joe Pantuso</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pantuso.com/tags/food/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What I Think About When I Think About Wine Headaches</title>
      <link>https://pantuso.com/posts/wine-headaches/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pantuso.com/posts/wine-headaches/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;If they think about it at all, people will commonly claim wine headaches come from sulfites. This is almost certainly wrong, and it&amp;rsquo;s been wrong so confidently and for so long that it&amp;rsquo;s become received wisdom. (Dehydration is implicated too, but I think that&amp;rsquo;s not the main case unless you go on an actual bender.)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Sulfites are a preservative added to most wine, and they sound like the kind of thing that would cause headaches. The problem with the sulfite theory is empirical: dried apricots contain roughly ten times the sulfite concentration of most red wine, and nobody reports apricot headaches. People with genuine sulfite sensitivity - a real condition, primarily affecting asthmatics — experience respiratory symptoms, not headaches. If sulfites caused wine headaches, white wine (which has higher sulfite content than red) would cause more headaches than red. It doesn&amp;rsquo;t. The pattern is exactly backwards.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
