<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Climate on Joe Pantuso</title>
    <link>https://pantuso.com/tags/climate/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Climate on Joe Pantuso</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pantuso.com/tags/climate/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Fossil Fuels in 2025 Are A Moral Hazard</title>
      <link>https://pantuso.com/posts/fossil-fuels-immoral/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pantuso.com/posts/fossil-fuels-immoral/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is a moral claim, not a policy claim. I&amp;rsquo;m not making an argument about carbon taxes or the Green New Deal or what the federal government should mandate. I&amp;rsquo;m saying that choosing to burn fossil fuels when viable alternatives exist is, at this point, a morally wrong choice — the same way it was morally wrong to choose a discriminatory vendor when non-discriminatory alternatives were available, even before it was illegal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
